Sustainable Living

Environmental uncertainty and digital technologies corporate in shaping corporate green behavior and tax avoidance

[ad_1]

  • Yu, H. et al. Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance: A quasi-natural experiments study based on China’s new environmental protection law. J. Environ. Manage. 296, 113160 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, Y. China’s response to climate change issues after Paris climate change conference. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 7, 235–240 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hossain, M. I., Tze San, O., Tabash, M. I., Siow, M. L. & Mohd Said, R. Systematic literature review and future research directions: Drivers of environmental sustainability practices in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Int. J. Sustain. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2022.10042695 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Miras-Rodríguez, M. del M., Carrasco-Gallego, A. & Escobar-Pérez, B. Has the CSR engagement of electrical companies had an effect on their performance? A closer look at the environment: Has CSR an effect on the performance? Bus. Strat. Env. 24, 819–835 (2015).

  • Gao, Y., Wang, Y. & Zhang, M. Who really cares about the environment? CEOs’ military service experience and firms’ investment in environmental protection. Bus. Ethics Environ. Resp. 30, 4–18 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, R., Shahzad, F., Abbas, A. & Liu, X. Decoupling the influence of eco-sustainability motivations in the adoption of the green industrial IoT and the impact of advanced manufacturing technologies. J. Clean. Prod. 339, 130708 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Song, M., Peng, L., Shang, Y. & Zhao, X. Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 174, 121276 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farza, K., Ftiti, Z., Hlioui, Z., Louhichi, W. & Omri, A. Does it pay to go green? The environmental innovation effect on corporate financial performance. J. Environ. Manage. 300, 113695 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • World Trade Organization (WTO). Re-globalization for a secure, inclusive and sustainable future. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wtr23_e/wtr23_e.pdf (2023).

  • Wei Ling, T. & Abdul Wahab, N. S. Roles of tax planning in market valuation of corporate social responsibility. Cog. Bus. Manag. 5, 1482595 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Debnath, R., Bardhan, R., Reiner, D. M. & Miller, J. R. Political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental dimensions of electric vehicle adoption in the United States: A social-media interaction analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 152, 111707 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Phillips, R. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2003).

  • Ali, S. M. et al. Development goals towards sustainability. Sustainability 15, 9443 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hossain, M., Ong, T., Heng, T., Mohd Said, R. & Siow, M. L. Nexus of stakeholder integration, green investment, green technology adoption and environmental sustainability practices: Evidence from Bangladesh textile SMEs. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Hum. 30, (2022).

  • Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17, 99–120 (1991).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Barney, J. B. et al. The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline?. J. Manag. 37, 1299–1315 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L. & Walker, G. Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 889–902 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ong, T. S., Teh, B. H., Ng, S. H. & Soh, W. N. Environmental management system and financial performance. Inst. Econ. 8, 26–52 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ong, T. S., Lee, A. S., Teh, B. H. & Magsi, H. B. Environmental innovation, environmental performance and financial performance: evidence from Malaysian environmental proactive firms. Sustainability 11, 3494 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D. & Vasvari, F. P. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J. Account. Public Policy 30, 122–144 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lev, B., Radhakrishnan, S. & Zhang, W. Organization capital. Abacus 45, 275–298 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Suchman, M. C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. AMR 20, 571–610 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scott, W. R. The adolescence of institutional theory. Admin. Sci. Q. 32, 493–511 (1987).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bansal, P. & Clelland, I. Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Manag. J. (2004).

  • Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L. & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strat. Manag. J. 34, 891–909 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prajogo, D., Tang, A. K. Y. & Lai, K. Do firms get what they want from ISO 14001 adoption? An Australian perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 33, 117–126 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P. The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 30, 381–395 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M. & Tihanyi, L. A model of the global and institutional antecedents of high-level corporate environmental performance. Bus. Soc. 43, 6–36 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliver, C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strat. Manag. J. 18, 697–713 (1997).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Trevisan, A. H., Lobo, A., Guzzo, D., Gomes, L. A. de V. & Mascarenhas, J. Barriers to employing digital technologies for a circular economy: A multi-level perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 332, 117437 (2023).

  • Biancardi, A., Colasante, A. & D’Adamo, I. Sustainable education and youth confidence as pillars of future civil society. Sci. Rep. 13, 955 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, K. & Hachem-Vermette, C. Economical energy resource planning to promote sustainable urban design. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 137, 110619 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghosh, D. & Olsen, L. Environmental uncertainty and managers’ use of discretionary accruals. Account. Org. Soc. 34, 188–205 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duncan, R. B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Q. 17, 313–327 (1972).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Purnomo, H. & Eriandani, R. The effect of enviromental uncertainty and tax avoidance: The role of managerial ability in emerging country. Ekuilibrium Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi 18, 72–82 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Habibi, Z., Habibi, H. & Mohammadi, M. A. The potential impact of COVID-19 on the Chinese GDP, trade, and economy. Economies 10, 73 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Del Giudice, M. et al. A self-tuning model for smart manufacturing SMEs: Effects on digital innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 38, 68–89 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Watkins, G. P. Knight’s risk, uncertainty and Profit1. Q. J. Econ. 36, 682–690 (1922).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • LeRoy, S. F. & Singell, Larry D. Knight on risk and uncertainty. J. Polit. Econ. 95, 394–406 (1987).

  • Langlois, R. N. & Cosgel, M. M. Frank knight on risk, uncertainty, and the firm: A new interpretation. Econ. Inquiry 31, 456–465 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Di Vaio, A., Hasan, S., Palladino, R. & Hassan, R. The transition towards circular economy and waste within accounting and accountability models: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 25, 734–810 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Desai, M. A. & Dharmapala, D. Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. J. Financ. Econ. 79, 145–179 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Russell, H. & Brock, G. Abusive tax avoidance and responsibilities of tax professionals. J. Hum. Dev. Capab. 17, 278–294 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cobham, A. & Janský, P. Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: Re-estimation and country results. J. Int. Dev. 30, 206–232 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arieftiara, D., Utama, S. & Wardhani, R. Environmental uncertainty as a contingent factor of business strategy decisions: Introducing an alternative measure of uncertainty. Australas. Account. Bus. Financ. J. 11, 116–130 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, L., Xu, Y., Pan, X. & Zhang, T. Green technology collaboration network analysis of China’s transportation sector: A patent-based analysis. Sci. Program. 2021, 1–12 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, L., Cai, Y., Wei, Y., Jin, H. & Teng, Y. P. What can cluster analysis offer stock investors? Evidence from the China’s energy industry. J. Info. Know. Mgmt. 22, 2250076 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, R., Gui, Y., Xie, Z. & Liu, L. Green governance and international business strategies of emerging economies’ multinational enterprises: A multiple-case study of chinese firms in pollution-intensive industries. Sustainability 11, 1013 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rothenberg, S. & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. Determinants of environmental innovation adoption in the printing industry: The importance of task environment. Bus. Strategy Environ. 16, 39–49 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • D’Adamo, I. & Gastaldi, M. Perspectives and challenges on sustainability: Drivers, opportunities and policy implications in universities. Sustainability 15, 3564 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R. V. & Guerrero, M. Blockchain technology and startup financing: A transaction cost economics perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 151, 119854 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, S. & Pan, X. The effects of digital technology application and supply chain management on corporate circular economy: A dynamic capability view. J. Environ. Manag. 341, 118082 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ren, X., Zeng, G. & Zhao, Y. Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Financ. J. 79, 102019 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, L. & Shao, J. Digital economy, entrepreneurship and energy efficiency. Energy 269, 126801 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldfarb, A. & Tucker, C. Digital economics. J. Econ. Liter. 57, 3–43 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zahari, M. K. & W. Muhamad Radzi, W. N. The impact of industry revolution 4.0 towards the readiness of employee in manufacturing sector In Johor Bahru, Malaysia. JISTM 6, 27–33 (2021).

  • Liu, L., Song, W. & Liu, Y. Leveraging digital capabilities toward a circular economy: Reinforcing sustainable supply chain management with Industry 4.0 technologies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 178, 109113 (2023).

  • Hossain, M. I., Teh, B. H., Tabash, M. I., Alam, M. N. & Ong, T. S. Paradoxes on sustainable performance in Dhaka’s enterprising community: A moderated-mediation evidence from textile manufacturing SMEs. J. Enterprising Commun. People Places Global Econ. ahead-of-print, (2022).

  • Zahedi, R., Zahedi, A. & Ahmadi, A. Strategic study for renewable energy policy, optimizations and sustainability in Iran. Sustainability 14, 2418 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ulgiati, S., Fiorentino, G., Raugei, M., Schnitzer, H. & Lega, M. Cleaner production for human and environmental well-being. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117779 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, L., Chen, Y. & Lee, S.-H. Emission tax and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a Cournot-Bertrand comparison. Energy Econ. 107, 105846 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, G., Wang, X. & Wu, J. How scientific researchers form green innovation behavior: An empirical analysis of China’s enterprises. Technol. Soc. 56, 134–146 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, R. & Ramanathan, R. Can environmental investments benefit environmental performance? The moderating roles of institutional environment and foreign direct investment. Bus. Strat. Environ. 29, 3385–3398 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sui, B. & Yao, L. The impact of digital transformation on corporate financialization: The mediating effect of green technology innovation. Innov. Green Dev. 2, 100032 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, J. & Chen, S. Corporate financialization, digitalization and green innovation: A panel investigation on Chinese listed firms. Innov. Green Dev. 2, 100068 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhuo, C. & Chen, J. Can digital transformation overcome the enterprise innovation dilemma: Effect, mechanism and effective boundary. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 190, 122378 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y., Chiasson, A., Li, X. & Lawrence, S. The effect of tax cuts and jobs act on corporate debt ratios. JAT 15, 1–12 (2023).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Geng, M.-M. & He, L.-Y. Environmental regulation, environmental awareness and environmental governance satisfaction. Sustainability 13, 3960 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tze San, O., Latif, B. & Di Vaio, A. GEO and sustainable performance: The moderating role of GTD and environmental consciousness. J. Intell. Capital 23, 38–67 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Omonijo, O. N. & Yunsheng, Z. Impact mechanism of technological innovation by Chinese companies on CSR in Africa mobile communication industry. Innov. Green Dev. 1, 100005 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blaufus, K., Möhlmann, A. & Schwäbe, A. N. Stock price reactions to news about corporate tax avoidance and evasion. J. Econ. Psychol. 72, 278–292 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, W., Wang, L. & Zhou, K. Z. Green practices and customer evaluations of the service experience: The moderating roles of external environmental factors and firm characteristics. J. Bus. Ethics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05044-x (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. & Reno, R. R. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. (SAGE, 1991).

  • Krieg, K. S. & Li, J. A review of corporate social responsibility and reputational costs in the tax avoidance literature*. Account. Perspect. 20, 477–542 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A. & Portillo-Tarragona, P. Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 11, 1129–1158 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Benlemlih, M., Jaballah, J., Schochet, S. & Peillex, J. Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance: The channel effect of consumer awareness. J. Bus. Financ. Account. 50, 31–60 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heine, D. & Black, S. Benefits beyond Climate: Environmental Tax Reform. in Fiscal Policies for Development and Climate Action 1–63 (The World Bank, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1358-0_ch1.

  • [ad_2]

    Read More

    Related Articles

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Back to top button